Přejít k obsahu

¿Qué filosofía? El debate entre Habermas y Rorty

no cover found
    Statement of Responsibility:
    Gomila Benejam, Antoni
    Hlavní autor:
    Gomila Benejam, Antoni

    We do not have a clear identifier or note about this person. You can try to get more information using external search engines:

    Formát:
    Journal article
    Jazyk:
    Spanish; Castilian
    Forma / Žánr:
    text (article)
    Vydáno:
    Universidad de León: Servicio de Publicaciones 1987
    V:
    Contextos ISSN 0212-6192 Nº 10, 1987, pags. 117-141
    Předmětová hesla:
    Annotation:

    When it looked as if the several ways of doing philosophy had nothing in common, the dialogue between Habermas and Rorty emerged steadily few years ago. Both of them, being outstanding representatives of their own traditions, were conscious of their failures; both of them argue for original views about the nature and history of philosophy; both of them resort, in their respective proposals, to ideas clearly from the other tradition -Habermas to pragmatism, Rorty to hermeneutics-. Too many coincidences to ignore them. This paper contends that their dissent arises from what they share. We will consider their assessment of the philosophical task, the reasons that have contributed to the development of their respective conceptions -the conversation of Mankind, the Theory of Communicative Action and what is really at stake in the debate: the historicity or not of the intersubjective character of rationality.


This is beta version