Prosodia y gestualidad y su relación con la expresión del humor en el debate parlamentario
![no cover found](https://literarybibliography.eu/themes/default/images/no_cover.png)
- Statement of Responsibility:
-
Romero Nieto, Alejandro
- Main Author:
- Format:
-
Journal article
- Language:
-
Spanish; Castilian
- Form / Genre:
-
text (article)
- Published:
-
2018
- In:
-
Cuadernos de investigación filológica ISSN 0211-0547 Tomo 44, 2018, pags. 45-66
- Subjects:
- Annotation:
-
In this paper we present the analysis of the gesture and prosody of a political speaker during a parliamentary debate from the point of view of the expression of humour. The purpose of this analysis is to verify if the speaker marks in a significative way, either prosodically or gestually, his humorous utterances during his interventions in the Chamber of Deputies. The analysis focuses on a single speaker, socialist deputy Antonio Miguel Carmona, from whom a series of audio-visual examples taken from the recordings of plenary sessions of the Assembly of Madrid has been selected. The conclusions drawn are that the prosodic feature that distinguishes serious speech from humorous is the pitch and that there is no clear relationship between the body movements of the parliamentary speaker and the manifestation of humour.
LEADER | 03088nab a22003610u 4500 | ||
001 | spart11365 | ||
003 | ES-LoD | ||
005 | 20230516100051.0 | ||
008 | 230516s2018\\\\sp\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\spa\\ | ||
022 | \ | \ | |a 0211-0547 |
041 | \ | \ | |a spa |
100 | \ | \ | |a Romero Nieto, Alejandro |
245 | \ | \ | |a Prosodia y gestualidad y su relación con la expresión del humor en el debate parlamentario |c Romero Nieto, Alejandro |
260 | \ | \ | |c 2018 |
520 | 3 | \ | |a In this paper we present the analysis of the gesture and prosody of a political speaker during a parliamentary debate from the point of view of the expression of humour. The purpose of this analysis is to verify if the speaker marks in a significative way, either prosodically or gestually, his humorous utterances during his interventions in the Chamber of Deputies. The analysis focuses on a single speaker, socialist deputy Antonio Miguel Carmona, from whom a series of audio-visual examples taken from the recordings of plenary sessions of the Assembly of Madrid has been selected. The conclusions drawn are that the prosodic feature that distinguishes serious speech from humorous is the pitch and that there is no clear relationship between the body movements of the parliamentary speaker and the manifestation of humour. |
538 | \ | \ | |a application/pdf |
540 | \ | \ | |a LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI |
650 | |a prosodia | ||
650 | |a gestualidad | ||
650 | |a humor | ||
650 | |a debate parlamentario | ||
650 | |a análisis del discurso | ||
650 | |a política | ||
650 | |a prosody | ||
650 | |a gesture | ||
650 | |a humour | ||
650 | |a parliamentary debate | ||
650 | |a discourse analysis | ||
650 | |a politics | ||
655 | \ | 4 | |a text (article) |
773 | |t Cuadernos de investigación filológica |x 0211-0547 |g Tomo 44, 2018, pags. 45-66 | ||
856 | 4 | |u https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6703765 | |
995 | \ | \ | |a Biblioteca Nacional de España |
stdClass Object ( [LEADER] => 03088nab a22003610u 4500 [001] => Array ( [0] => spart11365 ) [003] => Array ( [0] => ES-LoD ) [005] => Array ( [0] => 20230516100051.0 ) [008] => Array ( [0] => 230516s2018\\\\sp\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\spa\\ ) [022] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => \ [ind2] => \ [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => 0211-0547 ) ) ) [041] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => \ [ind2] => \ [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => spa ) ) ) [100] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => \ [ind2] => \ [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => Romero Nieto, Alejandro ) ) ) [245] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => \ [ind2] => \ [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => Prosodia y gestualidad y su relación con la expresión del humor en el debate parlamentario [c] => Romero Nieto, Alejandro ) ) ) [260] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => \ [ind2] => \ [code] => stdClass Object ( [c] => 2018 ) ) ) [520] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 3 [ind2] => \ [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => In this paper we present the analysis of the gesture and prosody of a political speaker during a parliamentary debate from the point of view of the expression of humour. The purpose of this analysis is to verify if the speaker marks in a significative way, either prosodically or gestually, his humorous utterances during his interventions in the Chamber of Deputies. The analysis focuses on a single speaker, socialist deputy Antonio Miguel Carmona, from whom a series of audio-visual examples taken from the recordings of plenary sessions of the Assembly of Madrid has been selected. The conclusions drawn are that the prosodic feature that distinguishes serious speech from humorous is the pitch and that there is no clear relationship between the body movements of the parliamentary speaker and the manifestation of humour. ) ) ) [538] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => \ [ind2] => \ [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => application/pdf ) ) ) [540] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => \ [ind2] => \ [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI ) ) ) [650] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => prosodia ) ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => gestualidad ) ) [2] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => humor ) ) [3] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => debate parlamentario ) ) [4] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => análisis del discurso ) ) [5] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => política ) ) [6] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => prosody ) ) [7] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => gesture ) ) [8] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => humour ) ) [9] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => parliamentary debate ) ) [10] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => discourse analysis ) ) [11] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => politics ) ) ) [655] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => \ [ind2] => 4 [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => text (article) ) ) ) [773] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 0 [ind2] => \ [code] => stdClass Object ( [t] => Cuadernos de investigación filológica [x] => 0211-0547 [g] => Tomo 44, 2018, pags. 45-66 ) ) ) [856] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => 4 [ind2] => 0 [code] => stdClass Object ( [u] => https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6703765 ) ) ) [995] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ind1] => \ [ind2] => \ [code] => stdClass Object ( [a] => Biblioteca Nacional de España ) ) ) )