Przejdź do treści

Diferencias semánticas entre los distintos tipos de completivas declarativas

no cover found
    Statement of Responsibility:
    Sánchez Salor, Eustaquio
    Autor:
    Sánchez Salor, Eustaquio

    Nie posiadamy jednoznaczego identyfikatora lub notki o tej osobie. Możesz spróbować zdobyć więcej informacji korzystając z zewnętrzych wyszukiwarek:

    Format:
    Artykuł z czasopisma
    Język:
    Spanish; Castilian
    Forma / Gatunek:
    text (article)
    Opublikowane:
    Universidad de La Laguna: Servicio de Publicaciones 1991
    W:
    Fortunatae: Revista canaria de Filología ISSN 1131-6810 Nº 1, 1991, pags. 221-234
    Hasła przedmiotowe:
    Adnotacja:

    The semantic solution to the question concerning the difference between the various ypes of declarative nominal subordinate clauses would be as follows: clauses which are normally constructed with infinitive only, dico Caesarem uenire, from the semantic point of view contain only the feature [+ QUID], that is, they indicate only the quidditas or content of the declarative verb. Clauses constructed with quod, doleo quod non venias, contain the feature [+ QUID] -indicating, in effect, the content of the affliction- and allo the feature [UNDE] since they indicate also the engin or starting point of the affliction. Finally, those clauses constructed with ut + subjunctive, such as accidit ut omnes deicerent, like all nominal subordinate clauses contain the feature (+QUID], given that they indicate the quidittas of the occurrence, as well as the feature [+QUOD], since they indicate ah° de end result produced by the situa- tion in question.


This is beta version