Przejdź do treści

A proposito del rapporto fra Filone e gli Stoici

no cover found
    Statement of Responsibility:
    Radice, Roberto
    Autor:
    Radice, Roberto

    Nie posiadamy jednoznaczego identyfikatora lub notki o tej osobie. Możesz spróbować zdobyć więcej informacji korzystając z zewnętrzych wyszukiwarek:

    Format:
    Artykuł z czasopisma
    Język:
    Italian
    Forma / Gatunek:
    text (article)
    Opublikowane:
    Universidad de La Laguna: Servicio de Publicaciones 2006
    W:
    Fortunatae: Revista canaria de Filología ISSN 1131-6810 Nº 17, 2006, pags. 127-150
    Hasła przedmiotowe:
    Adnotacja:

    Despite the large number of Philonic passages collected by H. von Arnim in his edition of the Stoic fragments, Philon should not be considered as a neutral source for the Stoic philosophy, since he reviews from his own standpoint the texts on which he draws, on both exegetical and philosophical grounds. In terms of the exegesis we should keep in mind the biblical narrative, while the Stoic elements in Philon's thought are often philosophically subservient to a transcendent Platonic perspective, which represented Philon's framework for the most profound meaning of his biblical theology. He does not, nevertheless, falsify Stoic thought, as the philosophical ground (e.g. the unity and the «many ways of being» of God, which involves the theory of the dunavmei") of Stoic allegory is not rejected. The autor draws these conclusions after an analysis of Opif. 8 = SVF II 302; Sacrif 68 = SVF II 453; LA II 22 = SVF II 458; Opif 26 = SVF II 511, 512; Migrat 178 f. = SVF II 532; Migrat. 180 = SVF II 532; Opif 66 f. = SVF II 722, 745; Confus 156= SVF II 664; Spec. I 32 = SVF II 1010.


This is beta version